| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
10/01/2023 |
|
Actualizado : |
10/01/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
GUARIN, J. R.; MARTRE, P; EWERT, F.; WEBBER, H.; DUERI, S.; CALDERINI, D.; REYNOLDS, M.; MOLERO, G.; MIRALLES, D.; GARCIA, G.; SLAFER, G.; GIUNTA, F.; PEQUENO, D. N. L.; STELLA, T.; AHMED, M.; ALDERMAN, P. D.; BASSO, B.; BERGER, A.; BINDI, M.; BRACHO-MUJICA, G.; CAMMARANO, D.; CHEN, Y.; DUMONT, B.; REZAEI, E. E.; FERERES, E.; FERRISE, R.; GAISER, T.; GAO, Y.; GARCIA-VILA, M.; GAYLER, S.; HOCHMAN, Z.; HOOGENBOOM, G.; HUNT, L. A.; KERSEBAUM, K. C.; NENDEL, C.; OLESEN, J. E.; PALOSUO, T.; PRIESACK, E.; PULLENS, J. W. M.; RODRÍGUEZ, A.; RÖTTER, R. P.; RUIZ RAMOS, M.; SEMENOV, M. A.; SENAPATI, N.; SIEBERT, S.; SRIVASTAVA, A. M.; STÖCKLE, C.; SUPIT, I.; TAO, F.; THORBURN, P.; WANG, E.; WEBER, T. K. D.; XIAO, L.; ZHANG, Z.; ZHAO, C.; ZHAO, J.; ZHAO, Z.; ZHU, Y.; ASSENG, S. |
|
Afiliación : |
JOSE RAFAEL GUARIN, Agricultural & Biological Engineering Dpt., Univ. of Florida, FL, USA; Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia Univ., NY, USA; NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, NY, USA.; PIERRE MARTRE, LEPSE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France; FRANK EWERT, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; HEIDI WEBBER, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; SIBYLLE DUERI, LEPSE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France; DANIEL CALDERINI, Institute of Plant Production and Protection, Austral University of Chile, Valdivia, Chile; MATTHEW REYNOLDS, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico DF, Mexico; GEMMA MOLERO, KWS, Lille, France; DANIEL MIRALLES, Department of Plant Production, University of Buenos Aires, IFEVA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GUILLERMO GARCIA, Department of Plant Production, University of Buenos Aires, IFEVA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GUSTAVO SLAFER, Department of Crop and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida—AGROTECNIO-CERCA Center, Lleida, Spain; and ICREA, Catalonian Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Barcelona, Spain; FRANCESCO GIUNTA, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Ital; DIEGO N L PEQUENO, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico DF, Mexico; TOMMASO STELLA, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; MUKHTAR AHMED, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan; Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden; PHILLIP D ALDERMAN, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States of America; BRUNO BASSO, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America; W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America; ANDRES GUSTAVO BERGER RICCA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARCO BINDI, Department of AGRIculture, food, environment and forestry (DAGRI), Department of Agri-food Production and Environmental Sciences (DISPAA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; GENNADY BRACHO-MUJICA, Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; DAVIDE CAMMARANO, Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America; YI CHEN, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; BENJAMIN DUMONT, Department Terra & AgroBioChem, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Gembloux, Belgium; EHSAN EYSHI REZAEI, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; ELIAS FERERES, IAS-CSIC DAUCO, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain; ROBERTO FERRISE, Department of AGRIculture, food, environment and forestry (DAGRI), Department of Agri-food Production and Environmental Sciences (DISPAA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; THOMAS GAISER, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; YUJING GAO, Agricultural & Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; MARGARITA GARCIA-VILA, IAS-CSIC DAUCO, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain; SEBASTIAN GAYLER, Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany; ZVI HOCHMAN, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; GERRIT HOOGENBOOM, Agricultural & Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; Institute for Sustainable Food Systems, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; LESLIE A HUNT, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada; KURT C KERSEBAUM, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), Univ. of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Global Change Research Institute Academy of Sciences of the Czech Rep; CLAAS NENDEL, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), Univ. of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Global Change Research Institute Academy of Sciences of the Czech Repu; JØRGEN E OLESEN, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark; TARU PALOSUO, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland; ECKART PRIESACK, Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; JOHANNES W M PULLENS, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark; ALFREDO RODRÍGUEZ, CEIGRAM, Technic University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Economic Analysis and Finances, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain; REIMUND P RÖTTER, Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use (CBL), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; MARGARITA RUIZ RAMOS, CEIGRAM, Technic University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; MIKHAIL A SEMENOV, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom; NIMAI SENAPATI, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom; STEFAN SIEBERT, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; AMIT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; CLAUDIO STÖCKLE, Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States of America; IWAN SUPIT, Water & Food and Water Systems & Global Change Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands; FULU TAO, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland; PETER THORBURN, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; ENLI WANG, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; TOBIAS KARL DAVID WEBER, Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany; Current affiliation: Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Organic Soil Sciences, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany; LIUJUN XIAO, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Jiang; ZHAO ZHANG, State Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; CHUANG ZHAO, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; JIN ZHAO, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark; ZHIGAN ZHAO, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; Department of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; YAN ZHU, National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for M; SENTHOLD ASSENG, 8 Department of Life Science Engineering, Digital Agriculture, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany. |
|
Título : |
Evidence for increasing global wheat yield potential. [Letter]. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Environmental Research Letters, 12 December 2022, Volume 17, 124045. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c |
|
ISSN : |
1748-9326 |
|
DOI : |
10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 13 June 2022; Accepted 30 November 2022; Published 12 December 2022. -- Corresponding author: Jose Rafael Guarin, E-mail: j.guarin@columbia.edu -- LICENSE: Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) -- Supplementary material for this article is available online (http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c ) -- |
|
Contenido : |
Wheat is the most widely grown food crop, with 761 Mt produced globally in 2020. To meet the expected grain demand by mid-century, wheat breeding strategies must continue to improve upon yield-advancing physiological traits, regardless of climate change impacts. Here, the best performing doubled haploid (DH) crosses with an increased canopy photosynthesis from wheat field experiments in the literature were extrapolated to the global scale with a multi-model ensemble of process-based wheat crop models to estimate global wheat production. The DH field experiments were also used to determine a quantitative relationship between wheat production and solar radiation to estimate genetic yield potential. The multi-model ensemble projected a global annual wheat production of 1050 ± 145 Mt due to the improved canopy photosynthesis, a 37% increase, without expanding cropping area. Achieving this genetic yield potential would meet the lower estimate of the projected grain demand in 2050, albeit with considerable challenges.
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd |
|
Palabras claves : |
Crop model ensemble; Global food security; Radiation use efficiency; Wheat potential yield; Yield increase. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
URL : |
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c/pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03876naa a2200913 a 4500
001 1063941
005 2023-01-10
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1748-9326
024 7 $a10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c$2DOI
100 1 $aGUARIN, J. R.
245 $aEvidence for increasing global wheat yield potential. [Letter].$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 13 June 2022; Accepted 30 November 2022; Published 12 December 2022. -- Corresponding author: Jose Rafael Guarin, E-mail: j.guarin@columbia.edu -- LICENSE: Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) -- Supplementary material for this article is available online (http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c ) --
520 $aWheat is the most widely grown food crop, with 761 Mt produced globally in 2020. To meet the expected grain demand by mid-century, wheat breeding strategies must continue to improve upon yield-advancing physiological traits, regardless of climate change impacts. Here, the best performing doubled haploid (DH) crosses with an increased canopy photosynthesis from wheat field experiments in the literature were extrapolated to the global scale with a multi-model ensemble of process-based wheat crop models to estimate global wheat production. The DH field experiments were also used to determine a quantitative relationship between wheat production and solar radiation to estimate genetic yield potential. The multi-model ensemble projected a global annual wheat production of 1050 ± 145 Mt due to the improved canopy photosynthesis, a 37% increase, without expanding cropping area. Achieving this genetic yield potential would meet the lower estimate of the projected grain demand in 2050, albeit with considerable challenges. © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd
653 $aCrop model ensemble
653 $aGlobal food security
653 $aRadiation use efficiency
653 $aWheat potential yield
653 $aYield increase
700 1 $aMARTRE, P
700 1 $aEWERT, F.
700 1 $aWEBBER, H.
700 1 $aDUERI, S.
700 1 $aCALDERINI, D.
700 1 $aREYNOLDS, M.
700 1 $aMOLERO, G.
700 1 $aMIRALLES, D.
700 1 $aGARCIA, G.
700 1 $aSLAFER, G.
700 1 $aGIUNTA, F.
700 1 $aPEQUENO, D. N. L.
700 1 $aSTELLA, T.
700 1 $aAHMED, M.
700 1 $aALDERMAN, P. D.
700 1 $aBASSO, B.
700 1 $aBERGER, A.
700 1 $aBINDI, M.
700 1 $aBRACHO-MUJICA, G.
700 1 $aCAMMARANO, D.
700 1 $aCHEN, Y.
700 1 $aDUMONT, B.
700 1 $aREZAEI, E. E.
700 1 $aFERERES, E.
700 1 $aFERRISE, R.
700 1 $aGAISER, T.
700 1 $aGAO, Y.
700 1 $aGARCIA-VILA, M.
700 1 $aGAYLER, S.
700 1 $aHOCHMAN, Z.
700 1 $aHOOGENBOOM, G.
700 1 $aHUNT, L. A.
700 1 $aKERSEBAUM, K. C.
700 1 $aNENDEL, C.
700 1 $aOLESEN, J. E.
700 1 $aPALOSUO, T.
700 1 $aPRIESACK, E.
700 1 $aPULLENS, J. W. M.
700 1 $aRODRÍGUEZ, A.
700 1 $aRÖTTER, R. P.
700 1 $aRUIZ RAMOS, M.
700 1 $aSEMENOV, M. A.
700 1 $aSENAPATI, N.
700 1 $aSIEBERT, S.
700 1 $aSRIVASTAVA, A. M.
700 1 $aSTÖCKLE, C.
700 1 $aSUPIT, I.
700 1 $aTAO, F.
700 1 $aTHORBURN, P.
700 1 $aWANG, E.
700 1 $aWEBER, T. K. D.
700 1 $aXIAO, L.
700 1 $aZHANG, Z.
700 1 $aZHAO, C.
700 1 $aZHAO, J.
700 1 $aZHAO, Z.
700 1 $aZHU, Y.
700 1 $aASSENG, S.
773 $tEnvironmental Research Letters, 12 December 2022, Volume 17, 124045. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
27/08/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
05/09/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
MACÍAS-RIOSECO, M.; SILVEIRA, C.S.; FRAGA, M.; CASAUX, M.L.; CABRERA, A.; FRANCIA, M.E.; REBOLLO, C.; MAYA, L.; ZARANTONELLI, L.; SUANES, A.; COLINA, R.; BUSCHIAZZO, A.; GIANNITTI, F.; RIET-CORREA, F. |
|
Afiliación : |
MELISSA MACÍAS RIOSECO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay./Programa de Posgrado en Salud Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la Republica, Montevideo, Uruguay; CAROLINE DA SILVA SILVEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay./Programa de Posgrado en Salud Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la Republica, Montevideo, Uruguay.; MARTIN FRAGA COTELO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARÍA LAURA CASAUX, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay./Programa de Posgrado en Salud Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la Republica, Montevideo, Uruguay.; ANDRÉS CABRERA, Unidad de Biología Molecular, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Mataojo 2020, Montevideo, 11400, Uruguay.; MARÍA E. FRANCIA, Laboratory of Apicomplexan Biology, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Mataojo 2020, Montevideo, 11400, Uruguay.; CARLOS REBOLLO, Unidad de Biología Molecular, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Mataojo 2020, Montevideo, 11400, Uruguay.; LETICIA MAYA, Laboratorio de Virología Molecular, Centro Universitario Regional Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Gral Fructuoso Rivera 1350, Salto, 50000, Uruguay.; LETICIA ZARANTONELLI, Unidad Mixta Pasteur, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Mataojo 2020, Montevideo, 11400, Uruguay.; ALEJANDRA SUANES, División de Laboratorios Veterinarios, Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca, Constituyente 1476, Montevideo, 11200, Uruguay.; RODNEY COLINA, Laboratorio de Virología Molecular, Centro Universitario Regional Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Gral Fructuoso Rivera 1350, Salto, 50000, Uruguay .; ALEJANDRO BUSCHIAZZO, Laboratorio de Microbiología Molecular y Estructural, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Mataojo 2020, Montevideo, 11400, Uruguay.; FEDERICO GIANNITTI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Causes of abortion in dairy cows in Uruguay. [Causas de aborto em bovinos de leite no Uruguai]. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Pesquisa Veterinaria Brasileira, 1 May 2020, Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 325-332. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-6550 |
|
DOI : |
10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-6550 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received on December 3, 2019./Accepted for publication on December 26, 2019. This research was financially supported by Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación (ANII), grant FSSA_X_2014_1_105696. The authors thank Yisell Perdomo, Cecilia Monesiglio, Anderson Saravia,Bruno Lopez, and all graduate students from the animal health platform at INIA, Jennifer McKenna from UW, Francisco Uzal, Karen Sverlow and Juliann Beingesser from CAHFS-UC Davis for valuable assistance. We are grateful to Luis Corbellini, for his keen and valuable suggestions preparing the manuscript, Ximena Salaberry from the Division de Laboratorios Veterinarios (DILAVE) of the Uruguayan ?Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca (MGAP),Santiago Mirazo from UdelaR, and Cecilia Nieves and Camila Hamond from the Institut Pasteur, Montevideo. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract: A case series study was conducted to determine the frequency of causes of abortion in dairy cattle in Uruguay. The sample size of 102 cases was composed of 53 fetuses, 35 fetuses with placentas, and 14 placentas without an associated fetus. All cases underwent gross
and microscopic pathologic examinations as well as microbiological and serological testing. The etiology was determined in 54 (53%) of cases, 51 of which were caused by infectious agents. Within the observed 102 cases, 30 (29%) were caused by Neospora caninum, six (6%) by Coxiella burnetii and two (2%) by Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis. Bovine Parainfluenza-3 virus and Salmonella enterica serovar Newport caused one abortion each. Opportunistic bacteria (Escherichia coli, Streptococcus sp., Staphylococcus sp., Mannheimia sp., Trueperella pyogenes, and Providencia stuartii) were associated with 11 abortions. In two cases the fetal death was attributed to dystocia, and in one case the fetus had a congenital mesothelioma. Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) infection was identified in three fetuses; two of which were co-infected with and had typical lesions of N. caninum. No lesions were observed in the other fetus infected by BVDV. Leptospira interrogans was identified in one fetus
without lesions. Despite the relatively low overall success rate in establishing an etiological diagnosis in cases of abortion in cattle, a systemic workup of bovine abortion is necessary to establish prevention and control strategies. This also facilitates monitoring and surveillance of reproductive diseases in dairy cattle, some of which represent a risk to public health.
Resumo: Uma série de casos foi estudada para determinar a frequência de causas do aborto em bovinos leiteiros no Uruguai. A amostra, de 102 casos, foi composta por 53 fetos, 35 fetos com placentas e 14 placentas sem feto associado. Todos os casos foram submetidos a exames patológicos macroscópicos e microscópicos, além de testes microbiológicos e sorológicos.A etiologia foi determinada em 54 (53%) dos casos, 51 dos quais foram causados por agentes infecciosos. Nos 102 casos observados, 30 (29%) foram causados por Neospora caninum, seis (6%) por Coxiella burnetii e dois (2%) por Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis. O vírus da Parainfluenza-3 e Salmonella enterica serovar Newport causaram um aborto cada. Bactérias oportunistas (Escherichia coli, Streptococcus sp., Staphylococcus sp., Mannheimia sp., Trueperella pyogenes
e Providencia stuartii) foram associadas a 11 abortos. Em dois casos, a morte fetal foi atribuída a distocia e, em um caso, o feto apresentava mesotelioma congênito. A infecção pelo vírus da diarreia viral bovina (BVDV) foi identificada em três fetos; dois dos quais foram co-infectados e apresentavam lesões típicas de N. caninum. Não foram observadas lesões no outro feto infectado pelo BVDV. Leptospira interrogans foi
identificada em um feto sem lesões. Apesar da relativamente baixa taxa de sucesso no diagnóstico etiológico nos casos de aborto em bovinos, é necessário o diagnóstico sistemático dos abortos para estabelecer estratégias de prevenção e controle. Isso também facilita o monitoramento e a vigilância de doenças reprodutivas em bovinos leiteiros, algumas das quais representam um risco para a saúde pública. MenosAbstract: A case series study was conducted to determine the frequency of causes of abortion in dairy cattle in Uruguay. The sample size of 102 cases was composed of 53 fetuses, 35 fetuses with placentas, and 14 placentas without an associated fetus. All cases underwent gross
and microscopic pathologic examinations as well as microbiological and serological testing. The etiology was determined in 54 (53%) of cases, 51 of which were caused by infectious agents. Within the observed 102 cases, 30 (29%) were caused by Neospora caninum, six (6%) by Coxiella burnetii and two (2%) by Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis. Bovine Parainfluenza-3 virus and Salmonella enterica serovar Newport caused one abortion each. Opportunistic bacteria (Escherichia coli, Streptococcus sp., Staphylococcus sp., Mannheimia sp., Trueperella pyogenes, and Providencia stuartii) were associated with 11 abortions. In two cases the fetal death was attributed to dystocia, and in one case the fetus had a congenital mesothelioma. Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) infection was identified in three fetuses; two of which were co-infected with and had typical lesions of N. caninum. No lesions were observed in the other fetus infected by BVDV. Leptospira interrogans was identified in one fetus
without lesions. Despite the relatively low overall success rate in establishing an etiological diagnosis in cases of abortion in cattle, a systemic workup of bovine abortion is necessary to establish prevention and contro... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ABORTO BOVINO; BOVINE ABORTION; BOVINOS DE LEITE; CAMPYLOBACTER FETUS; CATTLE; COXIELLA BURNETII; DAIRY CATTLE; NEOSPORA CANINUM; PLATAFORMA DE SALUD ANIMAL; URUGUAI. |
|
Thesagro : |
BOVINOS DE LECHE; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16698/1/Pesq.-Vet.-Bras.-405p.325-332-May-2020.pdf
https://www.scielo.br/pdf/pvb/v40n5/1678-5150-pvb-40-05-325.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 05497naa a2200445 a 4500
001 1061283
005 2022-09-05
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-6550$2DOI
100 1 $aMACÍAS-RIOSECO, M.
245 $aCauses of abortion in dairy cows in Uruguay. [Causas de aborto em bovinos de leite no Uruguai].$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received on December 3, 2019./Accepted for publication on December 26, 2019. This research was financially supported by Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación (ANII), grant FSSA_X_2014_1_105696. The authors thank Yisell Perdomo, Cecilia Monesiglio, Anderson Saravia,Bruno Lopez, and all graduate students from the animal health platform at INIA, Jennifer McKenna from UW, Francisco Uzal, Karen Sverlow and Juliann Beingesser from CAHFS-UC Davis for valuable assistance. We are grateful to Luis Corbellini, for his keen and valuable suggestions preparing the manuscript, Ximena Salaberry from the Division de Laboratorios Veterinarios (DILAVE) of the Uruguayan ?Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca (MGAP),Santiago Mirazo from UdelaR, and Cecilia Nieves and Camila Hamond from the Institut Pasteur, Montevideo.
520 $aAbstract: A case series study was conducted to determine the frequency of causes of abortion in dairy cattle in Uruguay. The sample size of 102 cases was composed of 53 fetuses, 35 fetuses with placentas, and 14 placentas without an associated fetus. All cases underwent gross and microscopic pathologic examinations as well as microbiological and serological testing. The etiology was determined in 54 (53%) of cases, 51 of which were caused by infectious agents. Within the observed 102 cases, 30 (29%) were caused by Neospora caninum, six (6%) by Coxiella burnetii and two (2%) by Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis. Bovine Parainfluenza-3 virus and Salmonella enterica serovar Newport caused one abortion each. Opportunistic bacteria (Escherichia coli, Streptococcus sp., Staphylococcus sp., Mannheimia sp., Trueperella pyogenes, and Providencia stuartii) were associated with 11 abortions. In two cases the fetal death was attributed to dystocia, and in one case the fetus had a congenital mesothelioma. Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) infection was identified in three fetuses; two of which were co-infected with and had typical lesions of N. caninum. No lesions were observed in the other fetus infected by BVDV. Leptospira interrogans was identified in one fetus without lesions. Despite the relatively low overall success rate in establishing an etiological diagnosis in cases of abortion in cattle, a systemic workup of bovine abortion is necessary to establish prevention and control strategies. This also facilitates monitoring and surveillance of reproductive diseases in dairy cattle, some of which represent a risk to public health. Resumo: Uma série de casos foi estudada para determinar a frequência de causas do aborto em bovinos leiteiros no Uruguai. A amostra, de 102 casos, foi composta por 53 fetos, 35 fetos com placentas e 14 placentas sem feto associado. Todos os casos foram submetidos a exames patológicos macroscópicos e microscópicos, além de testes microbiológicos e sorológicos.A etiologia foi determinada em 54 (53%) dos casos, 51 dos quais foram causados por agentes infecciosos. Nos 102 casos observados, 30 (29%) foram causados por Neospora caninum, seis (6%) por Coxiella burnetii e dois (2%) por Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis. O vírus da Parainfluenza-3 e Salmonella enterica serovar Newport causaram um aborto cada. Bactérias oportunistas (Escherichia coli, Streptococcus sp., Staphylococcus sp., Mannheimia sp., Trueperella pyogenes e Providencia stuartii) foram associadas a 11 abortos. Em dois casos, a morte fetal foi atribuída a distocia e, em um caso, o feto apresentava mesotelioma congênito. A infecção pelo vírus da diarreia viral bovina (BVDV) foi identificada em três fetos; dois dos quais foram co-infectados e apresentavam lesões típicas de N. caninum. Não foram observadas lesões no outro feto infectado pelo BVDV. Leptospira interrogans foi identificada em um feto sem lesões. Apesar da relativamente baixa taxa de sucesso no diagnóstico etiológico nos casos de aborto em bovinos, é necessário o diagnóstico sistemático dos abortos para estabelecer estratégias de prevenção e controle. Isso também facilita o monitoramento e a vigilância de doenças reprodutivas em bovinos leiteiros, algumas das quais representam um risco para a saúde pública.
650 $aBOVINOS DE LECHE
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aABORTO BOVINO
653 $aBOVINE ABORTION
653 $aBOVINOS DE LEITE
653 $aCAMPYLOBACTER FETUS
653 $aCATTLE
653 $aCOXIELLA BURNETII
653 $aDAIRY CATTLE
653 $aNEOSPORA CANINUM
653 $aPLATAFORMA DE SALUD ANIMAL
653 $aURUGUAI
700 1 $aSILVEIRA, C.S.
700 1 $aFRAGA, M.
700 1 $aCASAUX, M.L.
700 1 $aCABRERA, A.
700 1 $aFRANCIA, M.E.
700 1 $aREBOLLO, C.
700 1 $aMAYA, L.
700 1 $aZARANTONELLI, L.
700 1 $aSUANES, A.
700 1 $aCOLINA, R.
700 1 $aBUSCHIAZZO, A.
700 1 $aGIANNITTI, F.
700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F.
773 $tPesquisa Veterinaria Brasileira, 1 May 2020, Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 325-332. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-6550
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
